Journal Watch Archive - July 2009
JAMA 1 July 2009 Vol 302
1. genotype is independent of confounding between biomarker and outcome
2. genotype is associated with the biomarker (the stronger the association the better)
3. genotype is independent of outcome except as mediated through the biomarker.
49 Now let’s measure some more of these biomarkers and simply see what happens to patients some way down the line – 5067 Swedish patients, without cardiovascular disease, followed for a median of 12.8 years. Amongst the ones you may have heard of are cystatin C, possibly the best marker for renal function in most people, CRP, and BNP, the diuretic hormone secreted by distressed cardiac myocytes. The other three were lipoprotein-associated phospholipase 2, midregional proadrenomedullin and midregional proatrial natriureic peptide. Biomarker buffs will be sorry to note the absence of co-peptin, a very powerful prognostic marker indeed; but I guess that most of you will be able to contain your disappointment. Chuck the data into some MIT software and you get the answers: BNP wins for both total cardiovascular event and for coronary event prediction, combined with CRP in the first case and MR-proADM in the second. And yet Swedish honesty compels the investigators to point out that the additional value of these biomarkers over conventional risk factors is minimal. They will never get rich. “Education is a diversion to the instinct of lying and a bar to fortune”, as Hazlitt said. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/1/49
NEJM 2 July 2009 Vol 361
32 Here’s another triumph of Scandinavian honesty: a trial designed to discover if preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined positron emission tomography and computerised X-ray tomography can select the patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who are most likely to benefit from surgery. PET is expensive technology which depends on short-lived isotopes, but if it can spare patients (and surgeons) futile operations, then it has to be worth it. And it is. Those Danes randomised to this staging process rather than the conventional one had fewer operations, but overall mortality in the two groups was, unsurprisingly, the same. The nature of this beast is such that 35% of the PET guided operations were still futile, as compared with 52% of the conventionally staged. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/1/32
Lancet 4 July 2009 Vol 29
39 The world-wide escalating epidemic of type 2 diabetes is good news for some people: drug manufacturers. All we really know from the long term treatment studies is that metformin is the first line drug of choice. Beyond that, it’s a free-for-all. We’re becoming increasingly aware of the high potential of sulfonylureas to cause hypoglycaemia and weight gain, with no convincing long-term benefits to compensate; glitazones remain iffy; while modifiers of the incretin pathway sound wonderful but have yet to prove themselves in long-term studies. The drug company that wins the incretin wars is going to collect the biggest jackpot going. My money – if I had any – would be onexenatide at the moment, despite this open-label study promoting – sorry, investigating – the advantages of liraglutide. “Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a better option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations” say Novo Nordisk, sorry, the LEAD-6 investigators. But Amylin Pharmaceuticals have now produced a weekly injection of exenatide, which will need a new head-on study with the weekly version of liraglutide, if and when that appears; they have already trialled it against pioglitazone and sitagliptin in the DURATION studies and declared a win. General warfare will continue for years, with endless claims and counter-claims and no long-term, patient-important data. This is the whacky world of diabetes. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60659-0/abstract
26 In the ninth book of Homer’s Iliad, Odysseus has a post-battle meal of meat and bread and wine and then goes to Agamemnon for his next meal of the evening, in which the heroes
set on a blasing fire
A great brasse pot and into it a chine of mutton put
To rost and boile right cunningly: then off a well-fed swine
(George Chapman, Iliades, 1615)
29 The acute abdomen was once considered the great test of surgical diagnostic acumen, in which the “experienced surgeon” – usually a sleep-deprived registrar – would lead the bleary-eyed houseman through the differential diagnosis and then into the operating theatre where surmise would be put to the test while one cut and the other held the retractor. There’s a hint of nostalgia for all of that in the editorial (p.1) on this Dutch paper examining the best imaging strategies for acute abdominal pain. I certainly don’t share that nostalgia, but I do find this study impossible to contextualise, not just because my surgical days seem as far away as Bronze Age Troy (and about as pointless and bloody), but because of the absence of prior clinical probabilities. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/jun26_2/b2431
37 Hepatitis C is easily missed: this clinical review suggests that in primary care we miss about 50% of it. About a fifth of these will develop cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Again, go to the web for the full Monty; otherwise you may be a bit baffled by talk of the various genotypes and fazed by the density of information presented by two hepatologists and – hurrah – a Southampton GP. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/jun26_1/b2366
Plant of the Week: Magnolia “Nimbus”
This hybrid was raised by the American magnolia hero William Kosar in the early 1950s, from a parentage of M virginiana and M hypoleuca. The first is a spreading evergreen bush, the earliest magnolia to be brought to England from America. The second is a beautiful Himalayan tree with large melon-scented flowers. The hybrid is hard to propagate and I had never even heard of it until we visited a superspecialist nursery in Somerset to get some other rarities. Only a few years, and we’ll know if we bought wisely.
JAMA 8 July 2009 Vol 302
149 “Big mistakes are made through small holes” said the knife-wielders of a previous generation. A good motto for butchers, but these were surgeons. By contrast, today’s smart surgeons compete to see who can operate through the smallest hole, which also carries its risks, as this randomised Dutch study oftubular microdiscectomy demonstrates. “Tubular” refers to a special pipe-like retractor which is guided down to the herniated disc as it lies by the nerve root in patients with sciatica. Down the pipe goes something called a rongeur (French for rodent-like, from ronger, to nibble). Just think of it as a sort of ferret put down a pipe to nibble at your spine: what could possibly go rongue? In this meticulously conducted trial, the surgeon-ferrets were found to remove just the same amount of disc material as those performing conventional microdiscectomy but patient outcomes were worse for leg pain, back pain, and recovery; i.e. the sort of things you have sciatica surgery for in the first place. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/2/149
159 We stay in the Netherlands for the next study. Jeeves once pointed out to Bertie Wooster that “The Dutch, Sir, while an admirable people in many ways and renowned for their domestic hygiene, are not considered in the first rank in matters of argentine craftsmanship.” But here it is the hygiene of the Dutch population we are looking into, rather than their manufacture of silver cow creamers like the one that caused so much angst to Aunt Dahlia and Sir Watkyn Bassett. The health authorities of the Netherlands are considering pneumococcal vaccination for all babies in the first year of life, but this group decided first to study the effect of 7-valent conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage in children. Sure enough, vaccination had a suppressive effect on carriage of vaccine serotypes of pneumococcus, and suppression increased over three years. And in the Netherlands, unlike the USA, antibiotic resistance to the remaining serotypes continues to be very low. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/2/159
168 The admirable Dutch provide copious material for the main international journals, and so do the Gene Gnomes, a new subterranean species of humans who spread through poorly guarded internet connections. Some of these gnomes are also Dutch, and their spoken language is therefore known as double dutch. Their written language consists of coloured pictograms, random collections of italicised capital letters, and number sequences. Here is a fine example of their prodigious work in the USA, Germany and the Netherlands. They have identified 5 genetic loci harbouring common variants associated with variation in LV diastolic dimension and aortic root size. More than 50 authors gnomed away to do this meta-analysis, which proves that these loci in fact explain very little of the variance in these cardiac dimensions. Many were so eminent that JAMA took pity on them and published their results: in future, I think all such efforts should be relegated to an electronic-only publication called the Journal of Negative Genomics -JONG, like the sound your computer makes when you do something futile. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/2/168
179 Having blundered into the whacky world of type 2 diabetes in a BMJ editorial earlier this year, I’ve reached the conclusion that we urgently need to identify people at risk and stop them getting it, because we sure as hell don’t know what to do with them once they have. There are a number of risk scores which help to identify individuals likely to get diabetes, and a few biochemical markers of promise such asadiponectin. Adiponectin is a Good Thing, with anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing properties, and the more of it you have, the less likely you are to get type 2 diabetes – a fact confirmed by this systematic review. Oddly enough, it is produced solely by adipocytes, and is increased in obesity. It seems therefore that the less adiponectin you produce in relation to the amount of fat you carry, the more insulin resistant you will be. So you would think that the way to use adiponectin levels would be to express them as a ratio to total body fat, or waist circumference, but nobody seems to be following that promising route to diabetes prediction. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/2/179
NEJM 9 July 2009 Vol 361
123 The Dutch share the New England limelight here with the British in a small phase 1 study of a new drug, olaparib, a PARP inhibitor. PARP stands for Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase, which is an abnormal enzyme that generates genetic aberrations and leads to breast, ovarian and prostatic cancers in people with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Other people with these cancers do not express PARP, so if olaparib really is a magic bullet it will suppress the BRCA-related cancers but not identical cancers in other people. And that’s what it appears to do, hence the appearance of this paper in so august a journal. It may be the first demonstration of synthetic lethality, pharmacology finely targeted to kill cancers specific to a single genotype. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/2/123
135 Inhalational anthrax used to be uniformly fatal and remains a possible agent of biological warfare. Any hope of developing an antidote relies on animal experiments; the last human ones were carried out by the Japanese on prisoners in China, 65 years ago. This paper reports that rabbits and monkeys made to inhale anthrax survived more frequently if given raxibacumab, and antibody against an anthrax toxin called “protective antigen”. Testing on humans this time did not involve anthrax inhalation but proved that single doses can achieve levels protective in animals and don’t appear to be harmful. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/2/135
145 As His Holiness the Pope presents an anti-abortion leaflet to an impeccably polite Barack Obama, the New England Journal presents this paper on how to make medical abortion safer. Planned Parenthood centres in the USA achieved a drop in infection rates from 0.93 per 1,000 to 0.06 per 1,000 by two simple changes: a switch to buccal rather than vaginal administration of misoprostol, and the routine administration of antibiotics. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/2/145
170 My mother (aged 67) was diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer just as my father (aged 78) was reaching the end stage of protracted dying from heart failure. Since then, I’ve hated the two conditions equally, but although I put together the first book on palliative care for heart failure, I’ve never tried to do anything on ovarian cancer. The palliative side is fine, chemotherapy gets ever more effective, but actually catching it in time seems well-nigh impossible, as this excellent article on screening for ovarian cancer makes clear. Annual pelvic ultrasound has a positive predictive value of 1.5%, transvaginal US does little better, and serum CA-125 would require sequential measurement over time and still be inaccurate. When the four main US professional groups concur that screening is useless, you know that it really is. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/361/2/170
Lancet 11 July 2009 Vol 374
119 Kilmarnock does not often feature in the literature of medicine but it’s just the sort of place that should – a small town with its own hospital, an ideal place to make FAMOUS by doing practical research. But this trial of famotidine for GI protection in patients taking aspirin worries me nonetheless: it lasted 12 weeks only but 82 patients out of 404 dropped out in that short time. The reason seems to be that these canny Scots didnae want a second gastroscopy as they had no symptoms: so the investigators classed them as normal. In the remaining patients, those given placebo showed a 15% incidence of new gastric ulcers or erosions in three months of taking low dose aspirin: an alarming figure. So should we give them all famotidine and so reduce the incidence to 3.4%? The sponsors of this trial, Merck and Astellas, clearly want us to, so perhaps they are planning a new product that combines low dose aspirin and famotidine. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61246-0/abstract
119 Now that the BMJ has invented a new way of (not) presenting papers, called pico, it’s time that The Lancet trumped them by presenting its papers as pend. This stands for “promotes expensive new drug” and it could be accompanied by full page advertisements and personal testimonials from grateful patients, thus furthering Richard Horton’s grand plan for closer relations between academic medicine and the pharmaceutical industry. Hoffmann-La Roche are trialling a new drug for the immense and ever-growingtype 2 diabetes market. It is a dual agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ(PPAR) and it currently rejoices in the name of aleglitazar. No doubt it will be marketed under a name less reminiscent of a Babylonian king-list. That’s if it ever is marketed: three other PPARs have had to be withdrawn, tesaglitazar because it caused renal impairment, muraglitazar because it increased cardiovascular events and nebuchadnezzar because it caused grass-eating. From this phase 2 trial (SYNCHRONY) we are supposed to take comfort that aleglitazar may be safer than rosiglitazone at low dosage. If you are still interested, read the editorial on p.96. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60870-9/abstract
145 Hyperparathyroidism is a word that makes some of us start guiltily, remembering the lecture we fell asleep at. To be honest, I couldn’t bring myself to sacrifice enough of my weekend to read every word of this comprehensive review, let alone delve deeply in its 151 references. Should we be more on the lookout for this condition, which so few of us pause to consider in the hurly-burly of daily life? Well yes, and well no. We should probably be checking the serum calcium more often than we do: we should definitely be looking more for vitamin D deficiency, which is by far the commonest cause of hyperparathyroidism in primary care in northern latitudes. So far this year I have sent off about ten vitamin D tests, and all of them came back low. Forget the parathyroid: go out and buy some high dose vitamin D pills. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60507-9/abstract
BMJ 11 July 2009 Vol 339
86 The gene gnomes have even managed to invade the BMJ this week, though they have been persuaded to forsake double dutch (for the most part) and write in English. This systematic review tells us that there is definitely an association between polymorphisms of the filaggrin gene and atopic disease of various kinds, including asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis. It seems that this annoying word is here to stay: we shall just have to filaggrin and bear it. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul08_4/b2433
89 Ever since blockers of the tumour necrosis factor α first appeared, there have been worries about what these drugs might do in the longer term. This retrospective cohort study of patients given drugs forocular inflammation is not reassuring. Nasty old-fashioned drugs like methotrexate, ciclosporin and chlorambucil don’t appear to increase total mortality or cancer-related mortality whereas etanercept andinfliximab probably do. Bigger, longer term, prospective studies are urgently needed. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul03_1/b2480
96 What’s the best treatment for a small child with acute otitis media not responding to simple oral analgesics? Lidocaine drops (see Arch Dis Ch 2008;93:40). Can you prescribe lidocaine ear drops? No. So what do you prescribe instead? Amoxicillin. So what do parents do when their child next howls with earache? Why, yes, they come to you for amoxicillin. That’s the pattern described in this study – Dutch, of course – and it’s one that won’t be broken in the UK until somebody manufactures lidocaine ear drops, I suspect. http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/93/1/40
99 Thomas Cranmer was the first Archbishop of Canterbury to have any personal experience ofmarriage, which came in handy when he devised the 1549 Book of Common Prayer with its famous marriage service preamble concluding that it was given of God
…for the mutuall societie, helpe, and coumfort, that the one oughte to have of thother, both in prosperitie and adversitie. Into the whiche holy estate these two persones present: come nowe to be joyned. Therefore if any man can shewe any juste cause why they maie not lawfully be joyned so together: Leat him now speake, or els hereafter for ever hold his peace.
I forbear to quote from the East Finnish Marriage Service, though I am sure it is equally eloquent: and now we have a study showing that East Finns who remain in a state of coumfort one to thother in middle life go on to get less Alzheimer’s disease. Whereas Cranmer was burnt alive on a rainy day in Oxford before he could develop Alzheimer’s, and his wife had long fled back to Germany. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/jun30_1/b2525
104 As initiator and series advisor, it is my humble duty to point your attention to this week’s Easily Missed piece on Addison’s disease, complete with patient narrative. If you can think of another good topic, write to me at once. It’s not that we are short of ideas, but we’re just so keen to make this one of the most useful series ever for GPs, both innocent and experienced. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/jul02_1/b2385
Ann Intern Med 7 July 2009 Vol 151
1 Tell me if sartans really prevent renal disease. Telmisartan appears not to. In fact, decreases in estimated GFR were greater with telmisartan than with placebo in this trial in 5927 adults with known cardiovascular disease or diabetes. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/151/1/1
11 Turning purely to the whacky world of diabetes and a surrogate marker that I hate even more than HbA1c, we find that candesartan in this trial has no effect on microalbuminuria. Well, at least that’s better than last week’s trial of losartan in type 1 diabetes which trebled the amount of new microalbuminuria. Do we actually have any hard evidence that ACE inhibitors and ARBs improve hard outcomes in type 2 diabetes, aside from their BP-lowering action? Somebody spare me the effort of a literature search. Or of reaching those stupid QOF targets. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/151/1/11
Plant of the Week: Thalictrum diffusiflorum
There’s nothing like a great big thalictrum for the back of a summer border, carrying plumes of tiny white or purple or yellow flowers over a high stand of diaphanous foliage. But this one is not like that: it is a dainty small plant for a damp and somewhat shady place. It’s a vision of fragile elegance, with pale purple flowers much bigger than those of its larger sisters, and foliage even more filigree and weightless. I can’t imagine it surviving a season in our garden, but you never know.
JAMA 15 July 2009 Vol 302
290 Bless you! Sneezing can be dangerous, if you are one of the 25% of people who go around with apatent foramen ovale, which is a little flap between the two atria. Then if you sneeze, or go diving, or fly a fighter jet, your right atrial pressure will exceed your left atrial pressure, and venous blood will pass into your arterial circulation, just as it did when you were in the womb. Venous blood can carry little clots, or fat globules, or other gunk, which the lungs can filter easily and usually harmlessly: but not so the brain. Various studies found that people with severe migraine, strokes and multi-infarct dementia had more PFOs than the general population, so some cardiac surgeons in the USA have taken to closing them whenever they discover them during cardiothoracic surgery. This study painstakingly examined outcomes in 13,092 patients who had transoesophageal echocardiography in Cleveland, Ohio between 1995 and 2006. Intraoperative PFO closure was performed in 2277 of them. But there was no benefit and there is a definite trend to harm, ironically in a higher rate of postoperative stroke. Bless you. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/3/290
298 A year ago, I promised a patient with advanced ovarian cancer that I would do a literature search on the relationship between hormone replacement therapy and ovarian cancer. I found that the studies up to that time were inconclusive, though there was a trend towards higher risk, possibly around 30%. I ran this past the top HRT expert in Oxford but she was not able to quantify it either. I think we now can, thanks to this whole-population study from Denmark: it is indeed around 30% for all types of HRT and all types of ovarian cancer. The confidence intervals are very tight, as the study covered 7.3 million women years. Sadly the patient in question died a few months later, but I think we owe it to her to put this information in our HRT advice sheets. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/3/298
NEJM 16 July 2009 Vol 361
235 What is the best way to harvest veins for coronary bypass grafting? Some Oxford purists would scoff at this question and insist that grafts should be arterial whenever possible. Other European cardiac surgeons have taken to removing the saphenous vein through an endoscope. This leaves the patient with a neater looking leg than open vein harvesting and the leg also heals faster. But the veins themselves block more frequently and at three years there is a definite mortality disadvantage to endoscopic harvesting, according to this retrospective, non-randomised study.http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/3/235
245 If you carry the APOE ε4 genotype, your cognitive function will decline from before the age of 60 and you are highly likely to get Alzheimer’s disease (see the following study, p. 255). So if you have a parent with Alzheimer’s, do you really want to know your APOE status? This study attempts to ascertain the psychological effect of offering APOE genotyping to adults in this situation, and shows that in the short term there is little harm (and of course relief among those without the ε4 allele). The only adverse outcome was in people who were anxious to start with, who became more anxious if they had the bad gene. But I bet that includes more and more people as they approach 60. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/3/245
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/3/255
264 A few weeks ago I had occasion to touch on the joys of colonoscopy, a procedure much dreaded by most of its victims, though the bowel preparation is generally the worst bit. “They don’t like it up ‘em, sir, they don’t like it at all,” as Corporal Jones once said, albeit of a somewhat sharper instrument. But what if a miracle of modern technology allowed visualisation of the colon merely by swallowing an electroniccapsule? They don’t mind it down ‘em, sir. Except that is requires even more bowel prep and misses more lesions compared with direct colonoscopy, according to this European study which did a direct comparison in 328 patients. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/3/264
279 Bless you! You’d better go home right away – your sneeze could be the first sign of H1N1 influenza. If you do indeed get it, you will have time to do justice to this excellent historical perspective piece: if you are struggling amidst the stress and tedium of dealing with the outbreak, you’ll probably only have time for the shorter and even better account on p.225 (both attached in free full text). Pieces like these put a seal on the NEJM’s status as the best of the medical journals: none of the others has come anywhere near it in mapping, analysing and explaining this pandemic which has blown up over the last three months. It is essentially the same virus that caused the 1918 pandemic, one that mutated to cause “shift pandemics” in 1957 (H2N2) and 1968 (H3N2) with a few reassortments in between and now a reversion to a more benign version of the original. You won’t of course understand influenza epidemiology by reading these pieces – nobody does that – but you will reach a happy state of increased enlightenment. Bless you. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/361/3/279
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/361/3/225
Lancet 18 July 2009 Vol 374
210 Golly! Golimumab works where previous TNF-α blocking agents have failed in rheumatoid arthritis. Although this study, like so many in The Lancet, comes into the pend category (Promotes Expensive New Drug), it does seem to represent an important advance in a difficult group of patients. There was a highish drop-out rate (59 out of 461), but over the 24 weeks of the double-blinded study the rate of adverse effects was higher in the placebo than in the active groups. Golilumab achieved worthwhile remission in more than a third of these patients who had already had a variety of major treatments, in all cases including failed or discontinued TNF-α blockade. A fairly good head-to-head trial, then, but as the editorial (p.178) points out, we need longer-term safety data. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60506-7/abstract
222 We badly need an effective treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and this multinational trial was meant to INSPIRE hope that interferon gamma-1b would improve survival. But it didn’t: patients receiving the interferon had a lot of flu-like symptoms and died at the same rate as the placebo group. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60551-1/abstract
229 I was initially deeply sceptical about the place of circumcision as a population strategy against HIV transmission. Then two randomised studies showed a useful, if far from complete, protective effect against HIV infection in men. This study, on the other hand, shows a complete lack of protection tofemale partners of HIV-infected men; in fact transmission is increased in the weeks following circumcision, due to incomplete healing. So circumcision cuts both ways, so to speak. Tell it not in Gath, publish it not in the streets of Askelon, lest the uncircumcised rejoice. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60998-3/abstract
239 It’s 33 years since I was let loose with a cystoscope on patients with superficial bladder cancer, on the basis that it probably didn’t matter too much whether I spotted and zapped their new lesions correctly. Most bladder cancer is relatively benign, unless it has spread through the lamina propria, when it can start to require all manner of nasty treatments, ranging from intravesical cytotoxics and BCG to total cystourethrectomy. This American review is very comprehensive and includes a follow-up schedule somewhat more rigorous than is standard in the UK, including whole urinary-tract imaging every 12-24 months because of the 5% lifetime risk of an associated upper tract tumour. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60491-8/abstract
BMJ 18 July 2009 Vol 339
144 For the last couple of years, there’s been much debate about the relative merits of theFramingham versus the QRISK multifactor cardiovascular risk prediction scores in the UK population. This independent validation exercise shows that QRISK explains more of the variation at the cost of slight underprediction, whereas Framingham considerably overpredicts risk in UK men and slightly overpredicts it in UK women. In a theoretical world where every doctor and every patient did what they were told, this might matter. We are supposed to base our prescribing of things like statins on a risk equation of some sort; but in fact doctors divide into bulls and bears, and patients likewise. Some would like anything that reduces risk; others hate pills on principle. If we go by either of these scores, we will still miss the opportunity of preventing most cardiovascular disease. They are just very rough guides to be used in shared decision making with patients. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul07_2/b2584
152 I remember when proton pump inhibitors first appeared and were terribly expensive. I had a young patient with severe symptoms who told me he couldn’t possibly manage without them, and I was so appalled at the potential cost that I sent him to be considered for open fundoplication – also a new thing then, and costly, but I did the maths and persuaded the surgeon that this would be much less than the cost of a lifetime on omeprazole. Fortunately he did well. Now cheap omeprazole is Britain’s most popular drug and fundoplication is done through a laparoscope. So how do the two compare in 2009? In terms of cost, this study argues that operative treatment is still more effective than a lifetime of PPIs. But reading the head-on trials, I’d be pretty reluctant to undergo it because of the high incidence of medium-term effects like bloating and discomfort after eating. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul14_2/b2576
161 I remember being astonished over ten years ago to learn that the maternal circulation is teeming with fetal cells, but it’s even more spooky to think that it is also awash with cell-free fetal DNA and RNA. At the moment this can only be used to detect rhesus incompatibility, but in the next five years it might be the basis of a very reliable early pregnancy test for Down’s syndrome and other aneuploidies, plus single gene disorders and fetal sex determination. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/jul06_2/b2451
166 Lithium is a good drug, but it is not friendly to the kidney. This piece emphasises the wide areas of uncertainty which exist in the assessment and management of lithium-related renal impairment. Beware the “creeping creatinine” in these patients and remember to check their eGFR as well as their TSH at least annually. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/jul03_1/b2452
175 I don’t normally comment on Personal Views, but Ann McPherson’s courageous piece about facing death is required reading for everybody, and I am glad that Fiona Godlee made it the basis of her editorial and put the words “Assisted Dying – The Fight Goes On” on the front cover of this week’s BMJ. Ann’s use of the word “dignity” has already produced a typical response from a palliative care doctor who implies that the dignity she wants is a middle-class privilege to be claimed at the expense of the “vulnerable majority”. But the majority are already completely vulnerable to the whims of the “double effect” principle, formulated to protect the tender consciences of the palliative care theocracy. As a paediatrician points out in the Rapid Responses, this allows doctors to decide when they can give large doses of drugs such as opioids without any scrutiny, provided they claim that their primary intention is to alleviate symptoms rather than hasten death. It is high time we had a safer, kinder, and more accountable system for assisting death, decided by patients rather than doctors. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/jul15_1/b2827
Arch Intern Med 13 July 2009 Vol 169
1188 The attraction of coronary artery calcification screening is a complete mystery to me – big bills and big X-ray doses in order to provide big anxiety. But it seems that everyone is free to tout it, and when I examined a few websites, I found no mention of any hazard from the radiation dose, which can vary tenfold. This paper attempts to translate this into cancer risk. That’s pretty difficult as we have little to go on except extrapolation from the effects of much higher doses of radiation, but the figures are about 42 cancers per 100,000 men and 62 cancers per 100,000 women. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/13/1188
1195 One reason we take antihypertensive drugs is to prevent cognitive decline, and it’s been proposed that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors might be particularly good at this. Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study fail to show this as a class effect but they do show weak evidence of protection from centrally active ACE inhibitors such as lisinopril and ramipril, which are probably the ones you most prescribe. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/13/1195
1203 It’s from Leiden, so this paper has to be about thrombosis. Or its opposite, which isanticoagulation. Here is a trawl through four years of results from their warfarin clinic, and the results may not be what you expect. In my part of the world, the target INR for atrial fibrillation is 2.5, but these data support a target of 3.0 to 3.4. Conversely, we try to keep our patients with mechanical heart valves around 3.5, but this study suggests 2.5 to 2.9; and for myocardial infarction, we never anticoagulate at all, unless there is a mural thrombus, but in Leiden they seem to anticoagulate lots of patients and find it best to keep their INR between 3.5 and 3.9. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/13/1203
1210 We lost a loved one to a warfarin bleed two years ago, and the memory is still raw. Here a Swedish study suggests that measuring thrombomodulin may help to identify the patients on anticoagulants at most risk from bleeding complications. But perhaps by the time we know how to use this biochemical marker in clinical practice, warfarin will have been superseded. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/13/1210
John Donne for the Week:
As sickness is the greatest misery, so the greatest misery of sickness is solitude.
From Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions and Severall Steps in My Sickness, 1624, quoted in the week’sLancet, p.194.
JAMA 22-29 July 2009 Vol 385
385 This highly complex multinational study recruited 750 people with mild cognitive impairment, 529 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, and 304 controls and tookcerebrospinal fluid from all of them in order to identify clinically useful CSF biomarkers for incipient Alzheimer’s disease. The markers were, for your interest, Aβ42, T-tau and P-tau.That’s CSF β-amyloid1-42, total tau protein, and tau phosphorylated at position 181 threonine. You can find the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios on the link provided. Here’s a simpler test: if you can follow this then you certainly won’t get Alzheimer’s disease any time soon. http://jama.ama-assn.org/current.dtl
394 What we call heart failure is the end stage of many possible processes which singly or severally cause circulatory impairment sufficient to produce a familiar cluster of symptoms and signs. The only subtypes of heart failure we have any clear idea of how to treat are those caused by myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy. Most of the rest is caused by longstanding hypertension and age-related stiffening of the heart and capacitance vessels. We all assume that if you smoke and you are fat your lifetime risk of heart failure increases. Other factors thought relevant in this study were exercise, 5 or more alcoholic drinks per week (for protection), breakfast cereals and fruit and vegetable consumption. In fact obesity was the biggest predictor in this study, though paradoxically the obese survive heart failure best once they’ve got it. The rest of these factors show small effects which are additive. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/4/394
412 At the end of this review of lipoprotein (a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and nonvascular mortality there is a list of all the members of the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, who allegedly joined forces in writing this piece. Since they number hundreds I guess each one must have contributed about ten words. These eminent researchers conclude that there is a continuous, independent and modest association between Lp(a) concentration and the risk of CHD and stroke. So it might be weakly causative for vascular disease, or weakly associated with it. But do we really need any new Risk Factors to Emerge? I’d suggest they take Milton’s advice to Melancholy:
In Stygian Cave forlorn
‘Mongst horrid shapes, and shrieks, and sights unholy,
Find out som uncouth cell,
Were brooding darknes spreads his jealous wings,
And the night-Raven sings,
There under Ebon shades, and low-brow’d Rocks,
As ragged as thy Locks,
In dark Cimmerian desert ever dwell.
From L’Allegro, POEMS of Mr. John Milton, 1645
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/302/4/412
NEJM 23 July 2009 Vol 361
335 Several generations of British boys were inspired to become doctors by reading A.J. Cronin’s 1937 novel The Citadel. I say “boys” because it’s a tale of male bonding and heroic actions like promoting amateur surgery and blowing up water mains, little calculated to appeal to girls of a scientific bent. The idealistic young doctor-hero, Andrew Manson, discovers that impoverished Welsh households supplied by a certain water company are being stricken with “the enteric”, i.e. typhoid. Fed up with cycling from one dying patient to another, he decides to take direct action. More than seventy years later, typhoid still kills the poor of many developing countries, like those in Kolkata, India where this cluster-randomised trial of Vi typhoid vaccine was carried out amongst slum-dwellers. The paper even contains a disease map eerily similar to John Snow’s famous cholera map of Broad Street in 1854. The remedy here was not to remove the pump handle or blow up the pipe but to vaccinate all children under 5 with a single dose of Vi polysaccharide. Not only does this demonstrate an 80% reduction of typhoid in the vaccinated, but also a 44% reduction of typhoid in the unvaccinated, through herd protection. There is another effective typhoid vaccine which is given in three oral doses on alternate days: the problem is not that there aren’t effective vaccines but that they don’t reach the people who need them. Oh, and clean water would also help. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/4/335
368 The pay for performance experiment in British primary care has attracted a lot of international attention, particularly in the USA – hence the appearance of this Special Article in the most exclusive of its medical journals. The investigators from Manchester and Cambridge (original UK versions) find that the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework saw a scramble to reach targets, which could be equated with an improvement in care, provided the targets were appropriate; followed by a levelling off of effort once the target had been reached. Pavlov’s dogs stopped salivating once they were fed. Prior to QOF there had been a steady linear improvement in outcome measures and greater continuity of care, and we can conclude that without QOF we would have been happier doctors with better treated patients and much lower administrative costs. The professional motivation of doctors is such that, left to themselves, most of them will try to improve their whole range of clinical care according to best evidence, whereas if you dangle bits of meat in front of them they will turn into Pavlovian dogs. It is time that QOF was abolished. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/4/368
379 A good practical review of ectopic pregnancy reminds me of the days when obstetrics and gynaecology were practised without ultrasound scanning; and also of the bizarre fact that in my area it is still unobtainable on a Saturday or a Sunday. Both Jewish and Christian teaching enjoin the saving of life on the Sabbath, but the British Weekend must never be disturbed. However, it’s just as well that five-days-a-week ultrasound did come along between 1970 and 1996, because that period saw a six-fold increase in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy. At the same time, due to greater vigilance and better imaging, the mortality rate has fallen steeply. Remain vigilant. It is a condition in the “Never Miss This” category, seven days a week. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/361/4/379
Lancet 25 July 2009 Vol 374
301 The PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults yields the acronym PATRICIA: faintly ridiculous, but perhaps tolerable if it described the study accurately. However, this is not a trial of some magic papilloma which when grown on young people stops them getting cancer, but of an anti-papillomavirus vaccine which when given to young women stops them getting HPV-16/18 infection. This will, it is hoped, prevent most of them getting cancer of the cervix. The vaccine, from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals who ran the trial, showed high efficacy, and according to the authors, many of whom own stock in GSK, it promises much for the reduction of HPV infection by universal mass immunisation. But why stop at vaccinating the world’s entire young female population? The accompanying editorial, written without conflicts of interest, suggests that we should vaccinate all male teenagers before their “sexual debut” as well, and we might get success on the scale of smallpox eradication. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61248-4/abstract
324 The patients I have seen with multiple myeloma over the years have generally been diagnosed at the stage when most of their bones look moth- eaten and they have all died within five years, mostly after many episodes of severe pain. Plasma-cell malignancy remains nasty, but this seminar on the subject is determinedly upbeat. One of the stars of the show isthalidomide, a drug developed and marketed as a hypnotic in the 1950s without any evidence for either its efficacy or its safety, as related by Druin Burch in Taking The Medicine (2009). This drug is uncommonly good at producing fetal malformations and neuropathy but it is also very good at stopping myeloma in its tracks and is coming to be used as a first-line treatment, though the less toxic lenalidomide may be a better option, especially in combination withbortezomib. Perhaps we can look forward to a time soon when myeloma will no longer mean four years of pain and debility followed by death. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60221-X/abstract
340 Considering it’s the code of life, Nature seems astonishingly cavalier about how may copies of the genome it leaves lying around in us. Lots of advanced plants like apple trees have two or three or even four copies of their chromosomes in every cell, and although humans remain resolutely diploid, we can carry many duplicate copies of individual genes. Up to four is the usual European maximum, but up to ten can be seen in some Africans. I tell you all this stuff in the hope that it might arouse your interest in this paper on genomic copy number variation, human health, and disease. If you’re like me, you’ll skim through it looking for (a) the bits you can understand and (b) the bits that seem to explain some clinical phenomenon, like the wide range of CYP2D6 drug metabolism, meaning that some mothers break down codeine so fast that they can poison their breastfeeding infants. The rest is meat and drink solely for the gene-gnomically inclined. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60249-X/abstract
BMJ 25 July 2009 Vol 339
206 Mammographic screening is having a hard time in the medical press these days, but then it deserves it. It has been oversold on the paternalistic (why not ever, in these days of equality, maternalistic?) assumption that women need to be given clear encouragement to have it done for their own good - and also because the statistics will look better, because you need an awful lot of women to demonstrate a survival benefit that is much less than 1% in absolute terms. The most combative opponent of screening mammography is Peter Gøtzsche, head of the Nordic Cochrane Collaborative, co-author of this study of overdiagnosis of breast cancer. His style of debate offended Nick Wald and colleagues in the BMJ’s Rapid Responses, which have become the best place to follow this debate after Fiona Godlee’s editorial and Iona Heath’s opinion piece. He’s more formal and restrained here, but concludes that one in three of the cancers diagnosed by screening is not really a cancer. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul09_1/b2587
214 If I discuss the preferred place of death with a terminally ill patient, I either have to be brutally frank about the limitations of the care I can promise them for 115.5 hours in the week, or else try and fill that gap myself. On evenings, nights, and throughout the British Weekend, general practice and the palliative services abandon all attempts at continuity, or sometimes even adequacy, of care. I don’t know what the answer is, and I don’t think this qualitative study of general practitioners and community nurses takes us much closer to it. Perhaps what we need are joint rotas of GPs and palliative doctors covering large areas, but anything that smacks of heroics cannot provide a lasting answer. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul15_1/b2391
220 Caught in the frantic paradoxes of the current influenza A/H1NI pandemic, I don’t think there’s a single GP in Britain who would share the sunny optimism of this paper on our successes in assessing its severity. But I’m glad to learn that somebody is out there trying to do some science, while the rest of us answer the telephone to a population encouraged to demand oseltamivir if they have the least symptom of anything that could be a virus. And I commend to your disbelieving eyes the accompanying editorial (p.181) on how wonderfully well the UK is managing this outbreak of swine flu related behaviour - more reminiscent of Pangloss, who said that everything is for the best in the best of all possible worlds, than Pandemic. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/339/jul14_3/b2840
Ann Intern Med 21 July 2009 Vol 151
103 As I’ve remarked on numerous occasions, colonoscopy is not a procedure that’s very popular with patients, and I imagine the prospect of another colonoscopy list has also made many a gastroenterologist inwardly mutter “how did I end up doing this”. So a way of doing fewer of them is to be welcomed, albeit cautiously in the case of this prospective cohort study using the results of two colonoscopies to predict recurrent adenomas with high-risk characteristics. It supports the common-sense view that if you take the results of two colonoscopies into account rather than just the latest one, you can improve your identification of low-risk individuals. But it doesn’t fully validate this hypothesis. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/151/2/103
121 Can Helicobacter pylori eradication reduce the risk of gastric cancer? Surely we don’t need a meta-analysis to give us the answer? But like so many things we take for granted in medicine, the answer is not as clear as you might suppose. The Italian meta-analysts found seven studies that met their rather broad inclusion criteria: all but one were carried out in high prevalence areas in Asia, only two assessed gastric cancer incidence, and only two were double-blinded. Sure, H pylori treatment probably does protect against stomach cancer, but we don’t appear to have any accurate NNTs for the kind of patients we see in Europe or the USA. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/151/2/121
Plant of the Week: Macleaya cordata “Spetchley Ruby”
This enormous perennial needs about 10m2 of garden space, and even then you need to watch out because it’s invasive. But if you have that amount of room, it’s worth every inch (OK, centimetre) for its big olive green lobed foliage and its great, self-supporting stems carrying plumes of red flower. It’s hard to believe how big it will get when you first plant it, and despite its great merits I shall be trying to dig out our plume poppy when it has finished flowering in October. If you want a bit, then is the time to ask, but you have been warned.
NEJM 30 July 2009 Vol 361
445 What surgical procedure can cure diabetes and add up to 20 years to life expectancy? The answer is Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the main kind of bariatric surgery performed on the 4476 patients in this American observational study. All but 13% of them had the procedure carried out via the laparoscope. About a quarter of the cohort had the alternative operation of laparoscopic gastric banding. There were no deaths within 30 days in this last group, whereas with the Roux-en-Y procedure, 6 (0.2%) died following laparoscopy and 9 (2.1%) died following laparotomy. The accompanying editorial (p.520) muses on these figures, concluding that until we find a better way of treating obesity, “the weight of evidence indicates that bariatric surgery is safe, effective, and affordable.” In a time of economic stringency, we need to ignore the Daily Mail and insist that this surgery is not a waste of resources on people who have only themselves to blame, but a real life-saver, especially for obese diabetics. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/5/445
455 It is pretty amazing that a parasite like malaria with lots of antigenic targets and a complex life-cycle should still defeat all our efforts at eradication. Even odder is that drug resistance in the malaria parasite shows a predictable geographical pattern, arising at theThai-Cambodian border and then spreading globally. This was described in a special article in last week’s Lancet : it was seen first with chloroquine, then with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and now threatens the effectiveness of our main modern weapon against Plasmodium falciparum, artesunate. Here is a small in-vivo study of the clearance rate of P falciparum in two groups of patients in two locations – Pailin in western Cambodia and Wang Pha in Thailand. The Cambodian malaria patients showed much slower parasite clearance with artemesinin treatment than the Thai patients. A worrying development, but a lot still depends on a timely global response. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/5/455
468 The heroic age of malaria research began when Ronald Ross, excited by the ideas of Patrick Manson, travelled to a malarial part of India and tried to persuade mosquitoes to bite himself and other people. But the mosquitoes were shy and would not bite. Then on his birthday he observed some rain-sodden mosquitoes attacking one of his malaria patients. He immediately caught them and found that they contained malaria parasites in the process of metamorphosis. Warming to his task he submitted a patient called Abdul Kadir to the bites of more mosquitoes. Other “volunteers” who submitted to his experiments were called Lutchman and Hussein Khan. Let their names live forever in the annals of parasitology, because they helped Ross to discover the entire life-cycle of the damned elusive Plasmodium falciparum. But 110 years later, the heroic age of malaria research continues. In the quest for a malaria vaccine, another 10 volunteers (names not given) submitted to be bitten by mosquitoes infected with P falciparum while they were protected by chloroquine. Five others formed a control group and were bitten by non-malarial mosquitoes. One month later, after discontinuation of chloroquine, all 15 volunteers were bitten by five mozzies carrying malaria. The 10 subjects who had been bitten by the infected mozzies earlier all showed complete protection, while all five subjects who had earlier been bitten by non-malarial mozzies got parasitaemia. So there it is: get bitten while protected and you develop an immune memory which protects you the next time. Instead of giving people antimalarials to take with them to malarial areas, we’ll be giving them chloroquine and sending them to a malarial mosquitarium to get bitten. ZheeeEEE! Ouch. That’s good. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/5/468
496 Psoriasis is a tedious disease to live with even now, but spare a thought for people who had it before it was distinguished from leprosy. At the beginning of the twelfth century, catching and confining “lepers” suddenly became the rage through out Europe. In England and Scotland, 220 lazar houses were built to confine the lepers in a population of 1.5 million. None of the bones found in the graveyards of these places shows any of the destructive changes characteristic of true leprosy, so the inmates must either have had psoriasis or else have been thought undesirable for other reasons. They were officially the beneficiaries of Christian charity, but now and again people would get mixed up and burn them along with Jews and heretics. Life at the time of Europe’s great mediaeval awakening was not just nasty, brutish and short but often just plain bonkers (see Epidemics and History by Sheldon Watts, 1997, ch 2). Anyway, for a good update on our understanding of the mechanisms of psoriasis this piece is worth browsing through. Lots and lots of genomics and complex signalling, but nothing that you could actually describe as a cause. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/361/5/496
Lancet 3 Aug 2009 Vol 374
369 It’s not often that The Lancet is completely devoid of anything to interest an old world generalist like me, but this issue comes very close. But because I think that all GPs should want to know what their patients think about the things we do to them, I commend to your attention this little editorial on the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. It’s a bit vague and generalised, and could even be said to be boring: but there you are. That’s it from this week’s Lancet. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61400-8/fulltext
BMJ 3 Aug 2009 Vol 339
273 The BMJ seems to have entered into a pact with The Lancet. There is zilch of interest in the research section, unless you think this report on the ineffectiveness of exhortation to improve physical activity following ischaemic stroke is an exception. Which I don’t. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul20_3/b2810
Arch Intern Med 27 July 2009 Vol 169
1265 In a lean week when JAMA is taking a break, the Archives are full of interest, starting with this American Heart Association study of time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Readers will have come to expect the name of Harlan Krumholz to appear at this point, and so it does. The Great Policeman of US cardiology is part of an inspectorate that finds wide and unexplained variations both in defibrillation delay (is this called “shout-to-shock time”?) and in survival to discharge. Not surprisingly, hospitals with better response times tend to discharge fewer patients in metal boxes. “The current study has highlighted a clear gap in care,” says the accompanying editorial (p.1261). “Now it’s time to close the gap, in a heartbeat.” it concludes, winsomely. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/14/1265
1282 It’s odd how some important drug effects get beneath our radar as jobbing doctors, even though they are common and long recognised. One is the serotonin syndrome we can produce by mixing SRI antidepressants with tramadol or tricyclics; another is the tendency ofantipsychotic drugs to worsen diabetes. “Phenothiazine diabetes” was described over 40 years ago, and modern antipsychotics are even worse. We are not talking about some minor elevation of HbA1c but about hyperglycaemia sufficient to cause hospital admission. This case-control study of 13 817 Canadian diabetic patients found that those who were started on antipsychotic drugs had a very marked increase in the risk of hyperglycaemic admission: for those already on antipsychotics the longer term risk increase was about 50%. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/14/1282
1290 “Dramatic” is not often the first word in the title of a medical paper, but then the authors are French. Also their results are dramatic. A Dramatic Reduction in Infective Endocarditis-Related Mortality With a Management-Based Approach in fact. Infective endocarditis is a truly dramatic disease with a mortality ranging from 11% to 36%. The last time I treated a case was 35 years ago, when I was a medical SHO in a small and sleepy unit in the North of England, where my consultant had decided to admit an acutely ill man he had seen the previous day, late on a Friday afternoon. He developed retinal haemorrhages and became blind in one eye and dysphasic as I was clerking him. Grabbing the nearest medical textbook, many years out of date, I decided to set him up with 4G of penicillin G IV 4hrly and a standard dose of streptomycin IM (as recommended circa 1960) while I tried in vain to contact the consultant. The effect was like Florey’s description of his first penicillin patient in Oxford: he was apyrexial and talking and seeing and eating normally the next day. When the blood culture results came in the day after they showed staphylococcus resistant to penicillin. But that didn’t matter: they were drowning in the stuff and didn’t stand a chance. In fact part of the success of these authors from Marseille is that they insisted on a small and simple range of antibiotic treatments, consistently given, and also who was in charge at each stage of the disease. They more than halved their mortality from 18.5% to 8.2%. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/14/1290
1299 I was drawn to read this paper by its title: Yield of Diagnostic Tests in EvaluatingSyncopal Episodes in Older Patients. I hadn’t realised that the “yield” it’s talking about is in dollars per patient (aged 65 or over) admitted to hospital. If you do the full works (as is usual in the USA) your patient can be made to yield $19K for tests alone, not including the stress ECG, ambulatory monitoring and tilt test you can charge them for after discharge. Even with the State of Connecticut meeting two thirds, patients are in grave danger of syncope when they see the bill. These authors from Yale then examine the cost-effectiveness of these tests in relation to a change in clinical management. Now there is a simple and well validated clinical rule set for syncope called the San Francisco Syncope Rule, which was ignored in most of these admissions. If you apply it, you can save vast amounts of money. To quote, “For example, the cost of a cardiac enzymes test affecting diagnosis or management was $10 331 in those meeting the SFSR vs $111 518 in those not meeting the SFSR.” This article appears in a section called Health Care Reform, and good luck with that, Obama: with medical bills like these, who needs bankers to wreck the economy? http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/14/1299
1307 The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial was the landmark study of tight glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, and it showed such a marked reduction in end-points that from 1993 onwards, tight control has become the accepted goal in this type of diabetes. The problem is that it is so difficult to achieve in at least half of these patients. But the effect is dramatic in this 30-year follow-up study. In conventionally treated cohorts, the cumulative incidence of retinopathy was 50%, of nephropathy 25% and of cardiovascular disease 14%. Not too bad by historic standards. But for those who had tight control imposed on them, the figures were 21%, 9% and 9%, and fewer than 1% had to have kidney replacement or an amputation. Impressive, but do not make the basic mistake of extrapolating these results to type 2 diabetes. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/14/1307
1317 Name a few drugs with anticholinergic properties. I am afraid that my degree ofcognitive decline is such that the list is very short. This French study is of little help because it merely refers the reader to the Thériaque, the Banque de Données Automatisée sur les Médicaments, or VIDAL. None of which I happen to have on my person at the present moment. I suggest that the ones you are most likely to prescribe are tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines like chlorphenamine and hydroxyzine, a lot of antipsychoitcs including chlorpromazine and olanzapine, plus oxybutynin and propantheline. This study replicates previous work in showing reversible cognitive decline due to these drugs, but for most of us it would have been helpful to stratify this by individual drug rather than APOE genotype, since bottles come ready labelled but patients don’t yet. http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/14/1317
Fungus of the Week: Russula vesca
Yes, it’s fungus time again in England. The Atlantic jet stream sends one area of low pressure after another to spoil the summer for sun-lovers, but the English mycophile (a rare creature) joyously dons an anorak and proceeds to the woods.
In my locality there is nothing much coming up yet, though a kind patient did send me an interesting specimen of the rare Amanita strobiliformis, one of five growing on her lawn, contrary to its alternative name, Amanita solitaria. It is attractive but evil-smelling and poisonous. The amanita to look for, after summer rain in the woods, is the delicious rubra, but only if you can positively and reliably identify it by its pink staining. Death lurks in the rest.
You are safer with the russulas, which also mostly have white gills, but never a ring or a volva. Some woods are covered with them, in a variety of cheerful colours. Most of them have white slightly bent stems which break easily and cleanly. Their gills, which are yellow in a few species, but never any other colour, tend to be regular and waxy and slightly fragile. Avoid the ones with red caps: a few are edible, but they are hard to tell from those that are not, and some are acrid. One small one is called Russula emetica, with good reason. But no russula is seriously poisonous, and those who wish to identify them precisely often resort to nibbling a tiny bit of the raw cap. Nice-tasting ones are good to eat: cardboard tasting ones aren’t worth taking home: those that burn your mouth you spit out and throw away. The next step is to take a few crystals of ferrous sulphate out of your anorak pocket and rub these on the wet gills: better still (found in superior anorak pockets) is Fehling’s solution.
Most yellow ones are OK; green ones too, and particularly so ones that are dark purple tending to green (Russula cyanoxantha). But one of the very best is the one I name above, R vesca, a tan brown colour, slightly peppery raw and quite delicious cooked, in butter with a few scraps of leek.
